In the past, if the referee group together to discuss, they will follow the decision of the majority decision, if it is 2:2 level, stick to the original decision. Now, if the 2:2 level, they will look at instant replay. "If the 2:2 level, we will look at the replay, if the replay shows the results are very clear and convincing, we have to sentence according to this." Dehms said. But if there is a referee for the decision unclear, the referee will have the right to uphold the original verdict. "If there referee, I know the ball pin in the sideline at the end, I am certain, I heard and saw, and definitely is the case, then I will believe my referee upheld," said Dehms , "out of bounds, home runs, to maintain the original sentence. This is our work. I will not let managers, coaches or players bother me, I will believe my referee. if he was sure that is no doubt that we will insist, will not even go to with the replay. " cheap mlb jerseys
Although most of Dehms believe the linesman was correct, but he also knows conviction was not perfect. "Referees are human beings like everyone else," he said, "Sometimes I could not tell. Players could not tell." Referee want 100% correct judgments, with the introduction of television, you can see them most of the time is correct. However, the erroneous ruling is a long home run problem, the referee for help no problem. "That's it, we can solve this problem, we can make use of other tools," has a 24-year career Tim referee said, "If we are wrong, can be corrected. As a referee, our goal is to make judgments are correct, and do not affect the results of the competition. This is a decision tool to help us, if it can help us to correct our mistakes, that is really great. "
